![]() ![]() If you're coming from an Intel chip like I did, you will be absolutely blown away. ( but I only work with 1080 material ).Īll to say that anything more than the original M1 will make you VERY happy. Even adding a "denoise" setting still plays back at full speed. Resolve color correction doesnt really slow the system down. Since then it has been developed and has grown substantially. DaVinci Resolve Studio: What’s the Difference Sneha Zacharia 4min read Post-Production Copied To invest or not to invest that is the question we’re here to answer In 2009 DaVinci Resolve was acquired by Blackmagic Design. I couldnt believe it was real the first time I exported a stringout. Latest Post-Production Production DaVinci Resolve vs. ![]() a High quality H.264 ( or H.265 ) export on a 90 minute 1080p movie takes 12 minutes. Keep in mind 1080 is just about 1/8th resolution of 8K, so 1/4 Debayer looks great. I edit in a 1080 Timeline, and then Switch to delivery resolution for output. Half debayer plays, but just a slight studder now and then. This machine cuts through 6K & 8K RED like Butter ( 8K - 70 fps, 1080P timeline, 1/4 debayer ). Keep in mind that Resolve utilizes the Machine better than Premiere. Here are a few "Experience Benchmarks" I can share. Until my new M2 MAX shows up, ( YAYYYYY ) I will continue using my original M1 MacbookPro 16GB. Or does anyone here have a new Mini already? Perhaps staff members at BMD have had the opportunity to test the Mini with Resolve before they came out to market?Ĭheers to all and thanks in advance for your feedback! These new Minis are just coming out, so I'll take any feedback based on specs as they look on paper. I wonder if that USD 500 difference, which is not that huge after all, justifies going with the Mini and its new M2 chip instead of the Studio. Rather, I'm wondering if the new Mini will be plenty for my normal editing work in Resolve, including editing, color grading and some FX (I'm not a power user of Fusion by any means, but hope to learn more), as well as sound and exporting. So I'm really not looking for rants about Apple's evil strategies to make us spend money or advice about adventurous paths to build my own PC rig. I don't buy into any computer-brand sects (these are only tools after all), but have been a Mac user for years and am not about to change platforms. Most notably, the Studio would have 32-core CPU as opposed to 19-Core GPU in the Mini. Also, the Mini would have 32GB RAM instead of 64GB. In the case of the Studio, I had decided to go with the intermediate configuration with upgrades, as follows:Īpple M1 Max with 10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 16-core Neural Engineįront: Two USB-C ports, one SDXC card slotīack: Four Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB-A ports, one HDMI port, one 10Gb Ethernet port, one 3.5 mm headphone jack.Īs far as ports go, the Mini loses the 2 front USB-C ports and the SDXC card reader (which I have both as a peripheral and in my BenQ monitor). My M2 Mac Mini configuration would be as follows:Īpple M2 Pro with 12‑core CPU, 19-core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engineįour Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI port, two USB‑A ports, headphone jack Now Apple announces the new M2 MacMini and I wonder if I should reconsider my decision. My mind was set on buying a new Mac Studio at the beginning of 2023, but I haven't made the purchase yet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |